The lineup of ex-generals and security officials who over the past
few weeks have demoralized the country by urging us to roll up our
sleeves for the cyanide shot - hundreds of murderers to be injected
straight into the bloodstream of Israeli society in exchange for
Gilad Shalit - raises some grave questions. Is there some sort of
ideological filter on the way up the ladder to the senior command
posts in Israel? How could it be that so many senior security
officials hold views that are so antithetical to Israel's security?
We all know that the hundreds of terrorists released in the 2004
Tannenbaum deal have sown death and destruction in Israel. So how
could people who are supposed to be responsible for our security
encourage the same scenario all over again?
Plainly, Gilad Shalit's release is not a military issue. It is
simply a question of the willingness of Israeli society to pay the
price. The army may not know where Shalit is - a damning admission
in and of itself. But it does know the whereabouts of the Hamas
leaders responsible for his captivity.
We could make those Hamas terrorists desire to release Shalit. But
we do not want a rocket war here and we do not want international
pressure, either. That is why Shalit is still in captivity. We could
cut off their electricity, but we do not want demonstrations
throughout the world and pictures of the hospitals in Gaza working
by candlelight. We do not want to pay that price, so Gilad is still
in captivity.
We do not want to face off against the bleeding hearts in our
justice system, so Israel's Hamas prisoners will continue to receive
visitation rights, academic studies and deluxe conditions that they
could never dream of getting elsewhere. That is why Shalit is still
in captivity. And possibly the most amazing fact of all: We insist
on continuing our payments and monthly salaries to Gilad's captors.
That is why Gilad is still in captivity.
With just a bit of creativity, we could employ countless actions
that would bring Gilad Shalit home without firing a single shot or
endangering a single Israeli soldier. But every action bears a price
and Israel's leaders assume that our society is not willing to pay
it. That is why Gilad Shalit is still in captivity.
The easy solution is to surrender and release terrorists. It seems,
though, that Israeli society is beginning to wake up and understand
that the release of terrorists also carries a price that it is not
willing to pay.
The Shalit campaign has finally understood that they must change
their strategy. We are beginning to see some of those changes in the
demonstrations that they hold and we can only hope that they will
not stop. After all, Treasury Minister Yuval Steinitz has already
clearly stated that it is possible to stop the cash flow from Israel
to the Hamas. He even stopped it for a short period of time after
the unity agreement between the PLO and Hamas.
Now, Steinitz should explain to the Shalit family why he does not
withhold that money on a permanent basis until their son is
released. Is it because of some sort of ultimatum of the Hamas? A
threat to continue to fire missiles at Israel?
Can our leaders explain what price they are not willing to pay to
free Gilad?
The time has come to switch strategies. Block the Brinks trucks
carrying money for Gaza. Cut off the electricity to Gaza. Cut off
the water. Protest against visitation rights for jailed terrorists.
Announce it in public and encourage the huge crowds that
participated in pointless marches to get involved. This is the type
of activism that the entire nation - both Right and Left - will
join.
When Israel's leaders will understand that the people are willing to
pay the price of Gilad's release but are not willing to send
hundreds of others to their deaths in his stead, we will finally see
real action to bring him home.
No comments:
Post a Comment