The only parties whose lot is improved by the Obama administration’s
Middle East policies are Iran, the PLO and the Muslim Brotherhood.
To hear it from the White House, and from Israel’s leftist media,
Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon is a major liability. As half the
planet now knows, Ya’alon is harshly critical of US Secretary of State
John Kerry’s persistent efforts to force Israel to surrender its land
and ability to defend itself to the PLO.
In a private conversation that Ya’alon did not expect to be made
public, he criticized Kerry’s so-called security plan that offers
Israel advanced technology in exchange for PLO control over its
eastern border. Ya’alon also rejected the notion that the PLO is
interested in making peace. And he stated the inconvenient fact that
PLO chief Mahmoud Abbas is only in power because Israel has security
control over Judea and Samaria.
Ya’alon also said, again in a private conversation, that Kerry’s
razor-sharp focus on Israel and the PLO owes to an “incomprehensible
obsession,” and that by neurotically pushing for a deal that has no
chance of being concluded or achieving peace, Kerry is exhibiting
“messianic” character traits.
Ya’alon’s private statements about Kerry were no harsher than public
statements that the Saudis have made regarding the Obama
administration’s regional policies. Last November, journalist Jeffrey
Goldberg interviewed Saudi Prince Alaweed bin Talal. According to
Goldberg, the Saudi royal attacked US President Barack Obama “with a
directness that would make Benjamin Netanyahu blush.”
Among other things, Alaweed said, “There’s no confidence in the Obama
administration doing the right thing with Iran. We’re really concerned
– Israel, Saudi Arabia, the Middle Eastern countries about this.”
Alaweed questioned Obama’s motives in negotiating with Iran, saying
the president is “wounded,” and appeasing Iran in order to win back
the support of Democratic lawmakers who oppose Obamacare. In his
words, “Thirty-nine members of his own party in the House have already
moved away from him on Obamacare. That’s scary for him.”
It is hard to think of harsher criticism than Alaweed’s. And yet, the
administration had nothing to say about it. Neither he, nor his fellow
Saudi prince Bandar Bin Sultan al-Saud, the Saudi intelligence chief
who said last month that he is scaling back intelligence cooperation
with the US, was personally attacked by the administration.
No umbrage was taken at their statements.
And again, their public statements were no less harsh than what
Ya’alon said in a private conversation about Kerry.
Neither the Israeli people, nor the US’s traditional Sunni Arab allies
support Obama’s policies in the region. They believe Obama’s policies
are dangerous for them, and antithetical to US interests.
Indeed, Ya’alon’s assessments of the administration are not only in
line with regional opinion, the vast majority of Israelis share his
views.
According to a poll published last week by Makor Rishon, 80 percent of
Israelis think that Kerry’s peace plan has no chance of bringing
peace. Seventy-three percent oppose his security plan for the Jordan
Valley. And 53% object to the entire premise of his talks – that
Israel should surrender almost all of Judea and Samaria to the PLO.
Moreover, the average man on the Israeli street sees the destruction
wreaked by the Obama administration’s policy throughout the Middle
East, and he cannot figure out what Kerry wants with us.
Syria is a humanitarian and geopolitical nightmare with global implications.
Rather than do everything possible to strengthen moderate forces in
Syria, like the Kurds, and cultivate, train and arm regime opponents
who can fight both the Assad regime and al-Qaida rebels, Kerry has
devoted himself to demanding that Israel release more Palestinian
terrorist murderers from prison.
Rather than protect Lebanon from the predations of Iran and Syria to
ensure its independence, Kerry is holding marathon meetings with
Netanyahu to try to coerce him into helping the PLO build another
Jew-free terrorist state in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem.
Rather than try to blunt the growing power of Hezbollah – Iran’s
terrorist army – in Syria, the US’s policy is inviting Iran, the party
most responsible for the war, to join the phony peacemakers club at
Geneva.
As for the rest of the region, from Tunisia to Bahrain, from Egypt and
Libya to Iraq, and Yemen, Kerry and the Obama administration as a
whole are content to watch on the sidelines as al-Qaida reemerges as a
significant force, and as Iran undermines stability in country after
country.
Then of course, there is Iran itself, and its nuclear weapons program.
After the six-party nuclear deal with Iran was concluded on Monday,
Iran’s leaders declared victory over the US. They boasted that the
most dangerous components of their nuclear weapons program are
unaffected by the deal they just concluded with the Americans. They
laid a wreath on the grave of Hezbollah arch-terrorist Imad Mughniyeh,
who masterminded the 1983 bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut
that killed 243 US servicemen. And they forced Lebanon’s Sunnis to
accept a Hezbollah-dominated government.
For its part, the Obama administration continues to insist that the
greatest threat to peace is the US Congress, because its members wish
to pass an additional sanctions bill against Iran that would only come
into force in a year if the Iranians do not abide by the agreement.
The only parties whose lot is improved by the Obama administration’s
Middle East policies are Iran, the PLO and the Muslim Brotherhood. But
none of them will praise those policies, because they all hold the US
in contempt.
This is why the Palestinian leadership continues to incite against
Israel and reject the Jewish state even as the US is acting as their
surrogate in talks with Israel.
This is why the Iranians mock the US, even though the White House just
cleared the way for Iran to develop nuclear weapons, and develop its
economy and has allowed it to take over Iraq and Lebanon, and defend
its puppet regime in Syria.
This is why the Muslim Brotherhood condemns the US even as the Obama
administration upended the US alliance with Egypt in order to support
the Muslim Brotherhood.
The Obama administration has responded to these demonstrations of
contempt and bad faith with extreme reticence. Either it issues
written, general condemnations, or it claims, as in the case of
Palestinian incitement, that it doesn’t believe it is productive to
publicly criticize the Palestinians.
Given this behavior, the Obama administration’s response to Yediot
Aharonot’s publication of Ya’alon’s private statements can be fairly
describe as apoplectic. It was also mean-spirited.
Shortly after Yediot published his private remarks, the administration
launched a full-bore public attack on Ya’alon, and by implication, the
government. As White House spokesman Jay Carney put it, “The remarks
of the Israeli defense minister, if accurate, are offensive and
inappropriate, especially in light of everything that the United
States is doing to support Israel’s security needs.”
In other words, the Obama administration just accused Israel of ingratitude.
But there is nothing ungrateful about Israel’s treatment of the US.
Americans are getting the same message from allies throughout the
Middle East. Under Obama, America’s regional policies are so
counterproductive that the US has come to be seen as the foreign
policy equivalent of a drunk driver.
As the US’s strongest ally, and also as a country that has depended
for decades on US support, Israel is a passenger in the back seat of
the car. On the one hand, we are happy for the ride. On the other
hand, the administration’s driving is endangering our survival.
It is only because our leaders are grateful to the US for its support
that the government is going along with Kerry’s ridiculous
peace-processing.
More important, what is gratitude, exactly? Is it shutting up and
watching your closest friend drive both of you over a cliff? Of course
not.
To be a good ally – and a grateful one – requires you to warn your
ally when his actions are ill-advised and dangerous. And that is
precisely what Israel has done. Israel’s behavior is the definition of
proper behavior.
Aside from being dead wrong, the anti-Semitic undertones of the
administration’s castigation of the Jewish state as ungrateful are
hard to miss.
State Department spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki lashed out at Ya’alon
saying, “Secretary Kerry and his team, including General John Allen,
have been working day and night to try and promote a secure peace for
Israel, because of the secretary’s deep concern for Israel’s future.”
These words, and nearly identical ones intoned by Carney, play into
the anti-Jewish stereotype according to which Jews are quarrelsome but
hapless wretches.
The flipside of this stereotype is the all-powerful Jewish conspiracy
that manipulates non-Jews into doing its dirty work. That slur
reverberated strongly in the administration’s condemnations of
Netanyahu and US Jewish groups for advocating the passage of
additional sanctions against Iran.
In both cases, the White House’s message is the same. Unlike other
groups critical of US policies, Israel and supporters of the Jewish
state have no right to speak.
Presumably the administration’s resort to these anti-Jewish tropes is
inadvertent, but the fact that they have been used repeatedly is
deeply disconcerting, and bespeaks, at a minimum, alarming
insensitivity.
Under tremendous pressure from the administration, Ya’alon apologized
for his leaked remarks and Netanyahu took to the Knesset podium to
praise Israel’s ties to the US and thank the US for its support for
Israel.
But this was not enough for the Obama administration.
They want Netanyahu disavow Ya’alon’s thoughts and withdraw the
defense minister from the negotiations.
According to AFP, a senior State Department official said, “We expect
the prime minister to put this right by expressing publicly his
disagreement with the statements against Secretary Kerry, the
negotiations with the Palestinians and Kerry’s commitment to Israel’s
security.”
For his part, Kerry said he will only speak to Israeli leaders who
agree with him. In his words, “I will work with the willing
participants who are committed to peace and to this process.”
In other words, the Obama administration is using Ya’alon’s private
remarks, leaked by an unidentified source to a newspaper with an
anti-Netanyahu editorial agenda, as a means to neutralize the most
powerful voice opposing Kerry’s obsessive, messianic behavior in the
Israeli government. They want to use American umbrage at the tone of
Ya’alon’s private statements to upend Israeli policy and force Israel
to embrace the substance of the Obama administration’s delusional and
destructive actions. And to advance this goal, they are using
anti-Semitic signals to castigate Israel and deny it the right to
speak on its own behalf.
Israelis love America. And for that reason, it is compelled to do what
anyone strapped into the back seat of a car driven by a drunk would
do: try to convince him to stop driving. As a grateful ally of the
United States, Israel should publicly tell the Obama administration
that what Ya’alon said in private is the truth.
And yes, sometimes the truth hurts.
Middle East policies are Iran, the PLO and the Muslim Brotherhood.
To hear it from the White House, and from Israel’s leftist media,
Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon is a major liability. As half the
planet now knows, Ya’alon is harshly critical of US Secretary of State
John Kerry’s persistent efforts to force Israel to surrender its land
and ability to defend itself to the PLO.
In a private conversation that Ya’alon did not expect to be made
public, he criticized Kerry’s so-called security plan that offers
Israel advanced technology in exchange for PLO control over its
eastern border. Ya’alon also rejected the notion that the PLO is
interested in making peace. And he stated the inconvenient fact that
PLO chief Mahmoud Abbas is only in power because Israel has security
control over Judea and Samaria.
Ya’alon also said, again in a private conversation, that Kerry’s
razor-sharp focus on Israel and the PLO owes to an “incomprehensible
obsession,” and that by neurotically pushing for a deal that has no
chance of being concluded or achieving peace, Kerry is exhibiting
“messianic” character traits.
Ya’alon’s private statements about Kerry were no harsher than public
statements that the Saudis have made regarding the Obama
administration’s regional policies. Last November, journalist Jeffrey
Goldberg interviewed Saudi Prince Alaweed bin Talal. According to
Goldberg, the Saudi royal attacked US President Barack Obama “with a
directness that would make Benjamin Netanyahu blush.”
Among other things, Alaweed said, “There’s no confidence in the Obama
administration doing the right thing with Iran. We’re really concerned
– Israel, Saudi Arabia, the Middle Eastern countries about this.”
Alaweed questioned Obama’s motives in negotiating with Iran, saying
the president is “wounded,” and appeasing Iran in order to win back
the support of Democratic lawmakers who oppose Obamacare. In his
words, “Thirty-nine members of his own party in the House have already
moved away from him on Obamacare. That’s scary for him.”
It is hard to think of harsher criticism than Alaweed’s. And yet, the
administration had nothing to say about it. Neither he, nor his fellow
Saudi prince Bandar Bin Sultan al-Saud, the Saudi intelligence chief
who said last month that he is scaling back intelligence cooperation
with the US, was personally attacked by the administration.
No umbrage was taken at their statements.
And again, their public statements were no less harsh than what
Ya’alon said in a private conversation about Kerry.
Neither the Israeli people, nor the US’s traditional Sunni Arab allies
support Obama’s policies in the region. They believe Obama’s policies
are dangerous for them, and antithetical to US interests.
Indeed, Ya’alon’s assessments of the administration are not only in
line with regional opinion, the vast majority of Israelis share his
views.
According to a poll published last week by Makor Rishon, 80 percent of
Israelis think that Kerry’s peace plan has no chance of bringing
peace. Seventy-three percent oppose his security plan for the Jordan
Valley. And 53% object to the entire premise of his talks – that
Israel should surrender almost all of Judea and Samaria to the PLO.
Moreover, the average man on the Israeli street sees the destruction
wreaked by the Obama administration’s policy throughout the Middle
East, and he cannot figure out what Kerry wants with us.
Syria is a humanitarian and geopolitical nightmare with global implications.
Rather than do everything possible to strengthen moderate forces in
Syria, like the Kurds, and cultivate, train and arm regime opponents
who can fight both the Assad regime and al-Qaida rebels, Kerry has
devoted himself to demanding that Israel release more Palestinian
terrorist murderers from prison.
Rather than protect Lebanon from the predations of Iran and Syria to
ensure its independence, Kerry is holding marathon meetings with
Netanyahu to try to coerce him into helping the PLO build another
Jew-free terrorist state in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem.
Rather than try to blunt the growing power of Hezbollah – Iran’s
terrorist army – in Syria, the US’s policy is inviting Iran, the party
most responsible for the war, to join the phony peacemakers club at
Geneva.
As for the rest of the region, from Tunisia to Bahrain, from Egypt and
Libya to Iraq, and Yemen, Kerry and the Obama administration as a
whole are content to watch on the sidelines as al-Qaida reemerges as a
significant force, and as Iran undermines stability in country after
country.
Then of course, there is Iran itself, and its nuclear weapons program.
After the six-party nuclear deal with Iran was concluded on Monday,
Iran’s leaders declared victory over the US. They boasted that the
most dangerous components of their nuclear weapons program are
unaffected by the deal they just concluded with the Americans. They
laid a wreath on the grave of Hezbollah arch-terrorist Imad Mughniyeh,
who masterminded the 1983 bombing of the Marine barracks in Beirut
that killed 243 US servicemen. And they forced Lebanon’s Sunnis to
accept a Hezbollah-dominated government.
For its part, the Obama administration continues to insist that the
greatest threat to peace is the US Congress, because its members wish
to pass an additional sanctions bill against Iran that would only come
into force in a year if the Iranians do not abide by the agreement.
The only parties whose lot is improved by the Obama administration’s
Middle East policies are Iran, the PLO and the Muslim Brotherhood. But
none of them will praise those policies, because they all hold the US
in contempt.
This is why the Palestinian leadership continues to incite against
Israel and reject the Jewish state even as the US is acting as their
surrogate in talks with Israel.
This is why the Iranians mock the US, even though the White House just
cleared the way for Iran to develop nuclear weapons, and develop its
economy and has allowed it to take over Iraq and Lebanon, and defend
its puppet regime in Syria.
This is why the Muslim Brotherhood condemns the US even as the Obama
administration upended the US alliance with Egypt in order to support
the Muslim Brotherhood.
The Obama administration has responded to these demonstrations of
contempt and bad faith with extreme reticence. Either it issues
written, general condemnations, or it claims, as in the case of
Palestinian incitement, that it doesn’t believe it is productive to
publicly criticize the Palestinians.
Given this behavior, the Obama administration’s response to Yediot
Aharonot’s publication of Ya’alon’s private statements can be fairly
describe as apoplectic. It was also mean-spirited.
Shortly after Yediot published his private remarks, the administration
launched a full-bore public attack on Ya’alon, and by implication, the
government. As White House spokesman Jay Carney put it, “The remarks
of the Israeli defense minister, if accurate, are offensive and
inappropriate, especially in light of everything that the United
States is doing to support Israel’s security needs.”
In other words, the Obama administration just accused Israel of ingratitude.
But there is nothing ungrateful about Israel’s treatment of the US.
Americans are getting the same message from allies throughout the
Middle East. Under Obama, America’s regional policies are so
counterproductive that the US has come to be seen as the foreign
policy equivalent of a drunk driver.
As the US’s strongest ally, and also as a country that has depended
for decades on US support, Israel is a passenger in the back seat of
the car. On the one hand, we are happy for the ride. On the other
hand, the administration’s driving is endangering our survival.
It is only because our leaders are grateful to the US for its support
that the government is going along with Kerry’s ridiculous
peace-processing.
More important, what is gratitude, exactly? Is it shutting up and
watching your closest friend drive both of you over a cliff? Of course
not.
To be a good ally – and a grateful one – requires you to warn your
ally when his actions are ill-advised and dangerous. And that is
precisely what Israel has done. Israel’s behavior is the definition of
proper behavior.
Aside from being dead wrong, the anti-Semitic undertones of the
administration’s castigation of the Jewish state as ungrateful are
hard to miss.
State Department spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki lashed out at Ya’alon
saying, “Secretary Kerry and his team, including General John Allen,
have been working day and night to try and promote a secure peace for
Israel, because of the secretary’s deep concern for Israel’s future.”
These words, and nearly identical ones intoned by Carney, play into
the anti-Jewish stereotype according to which Jews are quarrelsome but
hapless wretches.
The flipside of this stereotype is the all-powerful Jewish conspiracy
that manipulates non-Jews into doing its dirty work. That slur
reverberated strongly in the administration’s condemnations of
Netanyahu and US Jewish groups for advocating the passage of
additional sanctions against Iran.
In both cases, the White House’s message is the same. Unlike other
groups critical of US policies, Israel and supporters of the Jewish
state have no right to speak.
Presumably the administration’s resort to these anti-Jewish tropes is
inadvertent, but the fact that they have been used repeatedly is
deeply disconcerting, and bespeaks, at a minimum, alarming
insensitivity.
Under tremendous pressure from the administration, Ya’alon apologized
for his leaked remarks and Netanyahu took to the Knesset podium to
praise Israel’s ties to the US and thank the US for its support for
Israel.
But this was not enough for the Obama administration.
They want Netanyahu disavow Ya’alon’s thoughts and withdraw the
defense minister from the negotiations.
According to AFP, a senior State Department official said, “We expect
the prime minister to put this right by expressing publicly his
disagreement with the statements against Secretary Kerry, the
negotiations with the Palestinians and Kerry’s commitment to Israel’s
security.”
For his part, Kerry said he will only speak to Israeli leaders who
agree with him. In his words, “I will work with the willing
participants who are committed to peace and to this process.”
In other words, the Obama administration is using Ya’alon’s private
remarks, leaked by an unidentified source to a newspaper with an
anti-Netanyahu editorial agenda, as a means to neutralize the most
powerful voice opposing Kerry’s obsessive, messianic behavior in the
Israeli government. They want to use American umbrage at the tone of
Ya’alon’s private statements to upend Israeli policy and force Israel
to embrace the substance of the Obama administration’s delusional and
destructive actions. And to advance this goal, they are using
anti-Semitic signals to castigate Israel and deny it the right to
speak on its own behalf.
Israelis love America. And for that reason, it is compelled to do what
anyone strapped into the back seat of a car driven by a drunk would
do: try to convince him to stop driving. As a grateful ally of the
United States, Israel should publicly tell the Obama administration
that what Ya’alon said in private is the truth.
And yes, sometimes the truth hurts.
![[D09524_1600.gif]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLXxn7hrIhS4jFG79jFVXh8s9E58fx6VUO3H5oHCUmUq43OiinnovNNkceeQVnr4lewiETGGcLLipjI4789KMdNap361hxG8cp8-_T7dbvch7XltlS5hzuCPUHF12eRkk05hPP5FPOVpc/s1600/D09524_1600.gif)
So the American Studies Association has voted to boycott Israeli academics (based largely on the 'testimony' of the racist communist terrorist "Professor" Angela Davis). Just in case anybody was thinking that leftists sometimes act in a hypocritical way, especially with respect to Islam and Israel, I want to make it crystal clear that this is not the case. As you will see from this list, there is absolutely no inconsistency in what leftists believe.
