Muslims are anti-West, anti-Democracy, anti-Christian, anti-Jewish, anti-Buddhist, and anti-Hindu. Muslims are involved in 25 of some 30 conflicts going on in the world

It should be remembered that in 1918, with the fall of the Ottoman Empire, Britain and France were handed 5,000,000 square miles to divvy up and 99% was given to the Arabs to create countries that did not exist previously. 1% was given as a Mandate for the re-establishment of a state for the Jews on both banks of the Jordan River. In 1921, to once again appease the Arabs, another three quarters of that 1% was given to a fictitious state called Trans-Jordan.

The total for all the 22 Arab League countries is 6,145,389 square miles. By comparison, all 50 states of the United States have a total of 3,787,318 square miles. Israel has 8,463 square miles, about one-sixth of that of the State of Michigan. Iran, Turkey, Pakistan and Afghanistan are Muslim but not Arab and are not included. (See http://www.masada2000.org/geography.html for a graphic presentation of the land area of Israel relative to the size of the Arab countries.)

We are told that there is a difference between extremist Islam and peaceloving normal Islam.

Judging by their behavior, Muslims are anti-West, anti-Democracy, anti-Christian, anti-Jewish, anti-Buddhist, and anti-Hindu. Muslims are involved in 25 of some 30 conflicts going on in the world: in Afghanistan, Algeria, Bangladesh, Bosnia, Congo, Cote d'Ivoire, Cyprus, East Timor, India, Indonesia (2 provinces), Kashmir, Kazakastan, Kosovo, Kurdistan, Macedonia, the Middle East, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Sudan, Russia-Chechnya, Tajikistan, Thailand, Uganda and Uzbekistan.

Doesn't this mean that extremist Islam is the norm and normal Islam is extremely rare?

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism.

"For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa. While as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."   (PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein, March 31, 1977, interview with the Dutch newspaper Trouw.

Welcome to the Gaza - (Guns & roses)

Welcome to the Gaza
We've got bombs 'n' tunnels
We got everything you want
Honey, we own the Jews
We got there power and water
Whatever you may need
If you got the money, honey
We are your disease

[CHORUS:]

In the Gaza
Welcome to the Gaza
Watch it bring you to your
sha na na na na na na na
knees, knees
I wanna watch you die

Welcome to the Gaza
We kill each and every way
If you visit us you're gonna bleed
But it's the price you pay
And we want aid and sympathy
We are very hard to please
You can make the sky bright
But we will hide in schools
In the Gaza
Welcome to the Gaza
Feel my, my, my RPG's
I, I wanna hear you scream

Welcome to the Gaza
It gets worse here everyday
We already live like an animal
In the jungle where we play
If you got a UN force for what you see
They'll take it eventually
they can have anything they want
But Israel will not take it from me

[CHORUS]

And when you're brainwashed you never
Ever want to survive it, live with it,
So down, so down, so dooooowwwwwn
YEAH yeah yeah!

You know where you are?
You're in the Gaza baby.
You're gonna die!
In the Gaza
Welcome to the Gaza
Watch it bring you to your
sha na na na na na na na
knees, knees
In the Gaza
Welcome to the Gaza
Feel my, my, my RPG's
In the Gaza
Welcome to the Gaza
Watch it bring you to your
sha na na na na na na na
knees, knees
In the Gaza
Welcome to the Gaza
Watch it bring you to your
It' gonna kill you dead-HA!

----------------------------------------------------

Until Israel Takes it BACK!

A Real Plan to deal with Kerry & POTUS - Part 1

Kerry is nothing. He is the US Secretary of State....
Big Deal....He is just carrying out his maters wish and trying to destroy Israel
as quickly as he can.

There is no other explanation.

The terms that Kerry is promoting are a joke.

The enemy still wants all and will not budge from their positions.
And that is if the people at the negotiating table are even a representative of the Arab/Muslim/Nazi's.

We know how it is. Kerry is just one of them. Like Obama they have some sick view of the world that fits their agenda.

Israel will need to tell the US to step off. Get lost.
We will keep you posted what we decide to do.

If Scary Kerry and the POTUS want to talk, have them contact the King of Jordan and pressure him to take his people back. Period.

Block off all access to Arab / Muslim / Nazi workers and begin the work of expeling them to Jordan...whether Jordan wants them or not. Give them some shekels and send them on their way. Then replace them with Jewish Families and security. Those displaced from Gush Katif should have first choice.

All Members of Knesset need to be Jews, effective NOW.
All members at any government level need to be Jews, effective NOW.

The transfer program decided upon needs to be on each TV, Radio Station and all newspapers. A new MK needs to be appointed to begin the transfer.

The sooner the better.
Also tell Kerry & the POTUS to contact Iran in whatever way they choose.

Announce to the free people of Iran that weapons and money are available to them to begin to overthrow the Mullahs.

Restore mandatory Jewish Education...


 

Kerry forces Israel’s moment of decision

There was a ghoulish creepiness to US Secretary of State John Kerry’s visit to Israel last week. Here we were, beset by the greatest winter storm in a hundred years. All roads to Jerusalem were sealed off. Tens of thousands of Jerusalemites and residents of surrounding areas were locked down in their houses, without power, heat, telephone service or water.

And all of the sudden, out of nowhere, Kerry appeared. As Hamas-ruled Gazans begged the supposedly hated IDF to come and save them from the floods, and as Israel took over rescue operations for stranded Palestinians living under the rule of the PLO ’s gangster kleptocracy in Judea and Samaria, here was Kerry, telling us that we’d better accept the deal he plans to present us next month, or face the wrath of the US and Europe, and suffer another Palestinian terror war.

What is going on? Why can’t Kerry leave Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and the rest of the country alone, even for a week, in the middle of a blizzard of biblical proportions? According to leaks from the now five month old negotiations, after 20 rounds of talks, the Palestinians have not budged from the positions they have held to for the past 50 years. They do not accept Israel’s right to exist. They do not recognize the existence of the Jewish people. They do not believe that the Jews have the right to freedom or self-determination. They insist on taking control of our 3,000 year old capital. They demand that we surrender our ability to defend ourselves from foreign aggression and Palestinian attacks and infiltration from the east.


Kerry forces - Read The Rest of His Crap-

The anti-Semitic stench of Roger Waters / Pink Floyd

( Roger Waters is clearly very sick )

I’ve read some heavy-duty attacks on Israel and Jews in my time, but they pale beside the anti-Semitic diatribe recently offered by Roger Waters, Pink Floyd’s co-founder and former front man. In an interview with Counter-Punch online magazine, Waters experienced a Jew-hating colonic where he purged himself of all the racist refuse that had accumulated in his putrid system and clearly required release.

According to Waters, Israel is a “racist apartheid regime,” which practices “ethnic cleansing.” A great artist such as himself will not play in a country equivalent to the “Vichy government in occupied France.” But accusing Jews of being Nazi collaborators was not enough. Waters then went further, comparing Israel to the Nazis themselves. “I would not have played in Berlin either… during the Second World War.” Waters believes that Israel is guilty of genocide, only “this time it’s the Palestinian People being murdered.” 


Pink Floyd Scum - Read More

Only Religious Jews are Smart

Are Jews smart? 

Looking at Israel’s suicidal policies, the answer is not self-evident.

Yet, even those policies can be called smart if we recognize that they aim at normalizing Jews, making them assimilate into a typical nation-state, not a national state of Jews.

Learned ancient anti-Semites frequently taunt Jews for being useless to humanity. Compared to Egypt, Greece, or Rome, Jews brought nothing to the world. Most other nations did not benefit humanity, either, but at least they do not position themselves as proudly different. But even in antiquity, Jews were renowned for their commercial skills. In Alexandria, a highly developed and probably expensive city, Jews occupied the largest quarter. In Roman Europe, Jewish communities were so important that magistrates frequently donated to synagogues for political reasons; we know that from inscriptions.

Jewish input into the arts and sciences is a new and short-lived phenomenon. Only since the late eighteenth century have a significant number of Jews left their traces in the ocean of human knowledge. Whom have we given the world in the previous three thousand years? Spinoza, a second-tier philosopher, a handful of less famous baptized outcasts, and that’s it.

Besides our history of commerce, we have strong evidence that Jews were smart all along: the rabbinical literature.

Tens of thousands of bright minds invented and crunched the tiniest legal aspects of Judaism. Their intellectual activity could be called useless and even religiously misplaced, but by any measure it has been huge. From the age of three or five every Jewish male learns sacred texts. Most Jews learn to interpret them. The amount of memorization is staggering. Until their old age, Jews continue reading the holy books, studying commentaries, or at least reciting long prayers by heart. The synchronic environment is very conducive to intellectual development. 

The evolutionary processes has always played a role, too, both natural and sexual selection. Intellectual achievements in rabbinical studies were rewarded with profitable marriage. 

Smart Jews left more offspring than average, if not at birth than in terms of survival to adulthood. 

Rabbinical families married into each other, producing the intellectual creme of society. It is from such an intellectual background that Jewish Nobel Prize winners have sprung. They could have made decent rabbis if they had properly applied their intellectual abilities, but they opted for secular professions—and succeeded in them.

 A similar process can be seen in Japan and possibly in Korea, where an age-old prowess in arts has translated into the outstanding achievements in engineering.
That situation need not continue. The price for many geniuses is many stupid Jews. Jewish genius correlates significantly with obsessive-compulsive disorder, and in such people abnormal intellectual abilities are mostly manifested at a young age; long education and conscription diminish this creative window. Other nations compete with Jews for prominence: there are a hundred times more Indians and Chinese than Jews, so even if geniuses among those nations are a hundred times fewer than among Jews, the absolute number of Nobel Prize winners, for example, will be the same. Just as education spreads into Asia, Jews will be far outnumbered in prized intellectual positions. Not impossibly, competition may be looming even in Africa.

Just as other nations become educated, Jewish intellectual development is being devastated. Most people forgo the excellent rabbinical learning that taught memorizing and analytical skills to their grandfathers. 

Atheistic education is no match for the rabbinical venue, or Jews wouldn’t be smarter than the people of Western nations. Atheistic schools differ critically from yeshivas in their educational approach. In schools, it is pass-and-forget; hardly any adult recalls anything from any school course. Knowledge gained this way is often forgotten hours after the exam. The amount of material memorized is meager: only the portion relevant for current exam has to be kept in the active memory, and everything else can safely be forgotten. Analytical skills are not taught at all: schoolchildren are not presented with anything resembling rabbinical discourses and legal problems. Atheistic pupils do not argue lemmas based on a variety of approaches which range from metaphor to analogy to lexicology to formal logic.

Competition has faded. No longer do Jews need to intellectually superior to confront quotas in universities and hostility in the workplace. They are welcome everywhere, even the silly of them, and the government takes care of the outright stupid.
Natural selection has been abandoned. In a social welfare state, worthless spongers often produce the largest families. Excellent healthcare allows them to leave more offspring than the intellectually capable and busy Jews.

Sexual selection has taken odd turns. Polls show that by far most Israeli atheists would prefer that their daughter marry a Christian rather than a rabbinical scholar. Pretty looks are more important marriage qualities than intellect. Romance outweighs rational choice.

Before the rabbis, Jews were an insignificant Middle Eastern nation. In Israel, Jews are heading toward a similar outcome.

Only Religious Jews...- Read More

Immortality in the Torah

Immortality in the Torah

One theological notion to substantiate the resurrection is the story of Adam. 

It is interpreted traditionally that he was immortal before the apple incident. Nothing in the text supports this bizarre view. First of all, consider the terrible fate of a human being sentenced to eternal life. Who would ever like anything eternal? Eternity is good for someone who exists out the dimension of time, like God and perhaps souls, but not for time-counting human beings. 

Adam ate fruit: clearly, if he stopped eating, he would have died. The animals around him were mortal, killed later by Abel. It is therefore hardly plausible that man was the only immortal living being around.

Look at the text. In Genesis 3:3, God warns Adam against eating the fruit of knowledge lest he be destroyed. The word for destroyed is grammatically an emphatic passive verb, it does not denote a condition (like becoming mortal). There is no hint that otherwise Adam would have lived eternally. It is like the sign on an electric pole that reads, “Danger! Death!” True, Adam did not die immediately upon eating the apple, but perhaps the warning was not literal, or he was forgiven, or God just saw no point in killing the only human around. Not all of those who climb the electric pole die, either. 

In Genesis 3:22, Adam’s potential immortality is related to the tree of life. He became like a god in knowing good from evil, and now he could become even closer to them by becoming immortal.
Theoretically, it is possible that God accepted an ignorant immortal man, but refused immortality to a person who knew morality. 

That’s not illogical: such a person can perform an infinite number of immoral actions during his lifetime. Infinite immorality sounds like too much. Curious as the interpretation is, it is not supported textually.

Let's Sacrifice - Obadiah Shoher

Let’s sacrifice

‘[Prophet Samuel] went every year to Beth-El, and Gilgal, and Mitzpeh… and returned to Ramah… and he built there an altar unto the Lord.’ 1-Samuel-7

A major prophet, a highly respected authority on Judaism, doing what? Building altars! And he is not alone: Joshua, Manoach, David, Ezra, many other figures engaged in that absolutely prohibited activity. 

Rabbis have good explanations for each case, but if we look at the text’s plain meaning, neither the actors nor the authors had any qualms about unauthorized altar-building. 

It looks like the authors of the books of Joshua, Samuel, and Chronicles did not know about the Torah’s ban on out-of-the-Temple sacrifices.

After the Philistines released the Ark, it dwelt in several Jewish villages. Not even prophet Samuel thought of moving it to the official site of worship in Shiloh. The evidence suggests that religious service was not yet centralized.

History shows how problematic such centralization would have been. Left without God’s altars, Jews immediately lapsed into idolatry. The desire to have a nearby place of worship is deeply ingrained in humans. The legend that in the Second Temple period Jews refrained from idolatry is not exactly true. For one thing, transportation had greatly improved by that time, and the Jerusalem temple was not tremendously far away anymore. Nevertheless, archaeologists have found many pagan worship items in Jewish settlements. 

Also, during that time synagogues began to appear, which allowed a venue for out-of-Temple worship.
The idea of a centralized cult was a great one: a truly abstract religion without daily contacts with divine proxies, be it altars or statues. The centralized religion was conceived to be unobtrusive, allowing people to go on with their lives without performing superstitious rites at every step. 

Unfortunately, that does not work, and so Jews are still kissing Torah scrolls and blowing kisses to mezuzas. The only expanding sect of Judaism for the past two centuries has been the Hasidim, a firebrand folk-style religion far removed from the cold and abstract Judaism of Leviticus.

We do not have the Temple. 

Never mind. It did not exist for most of our history in the Land of Israel. 

We do not have the Ark. 

Never mind. Prophet Samuel was not in hurry to get it from the villagers. 

The common law is clear: when there is no Temple, Jews are allowed to build altars and sacrifice on them. And this is our current obligation.

Samson Blinded - Shoher

Transfer is too soft for the Torah

The Gibeonites had to pretend that they were from far lands in order to make peace with Joshua. When the Jews realized that they had been fooled, Joshua pressed the Gibeonites into servitude.

Nevertheless, Joshua 11:19-20 states that no town sought peace with the Jews because G-d hardened their hearts. 

The case of the Gibeonites supports the general principle that Jews must not leave any aborigines in the land they conquer. Presumably, the aborigines belonged to the six or seven tribes specifically proscribed, but in any case none of the previous inhabitants could remain in the land. The peace, therefore, could only be one of exile: the natives could leave our land peacefully or be killed.

G-d, however, did not want the peaceful option. He hardened their hearts so that the Jews would exterminate them.
How do we know that the aborigines must have sought peace before the start of hostilities? In Joshua 13:13, and elsewhere, it says that several native clans remained in the land. The Jews, the author laments, did not drive them out. He does not entertain the possibility of peace with them because by that time the option of peace has already closed, since the Jews had started their conquest. 

The option to expel rather than exterminate exists only for towns beyond the Land of Israel proper. We can expel natives in expansionist wars, but must exterminate them inside our own borders, says the Tanakh.

G-d is not nice

The G-d of the Holocaust and pogroms.
The G-d who commanded us to exterminate Amalek’s children because their remote ancestors attacked Jews in Sinai.
The G-d who demanded thousands of slaughtered animals on his holidays.
The G-d who commanded us to kill our fellow Jews over their private sexual habits. 
Is it not a decent human being’s obligation to rebel against such a G-d, to refuse him our “power of consent,” however futile the gesture?

For Christians, the answer is simple. Their religion is narrowed down to ethics, beautiful because of its fuzziness, like post-impressionism. Among its founder’s pronouncements, one may only disagree with the apocalyptic visions of righteous people herding their family members into eternal damnation. The possibility is rather remote. Rabbinical Judaism went much the same way, excising the harsh commandments from practical halacha.

Christians have yet another reason to submit to divine whims: salvation. That shameful doctrine has entered the sectarian Judaism of Essenes and Pharisees to the vehement opposition of the Temple priests, the Sadducees. The Torah does not know resurrection, only eternal sleep in Sheol. Prophets—disregarded completely by the priests as folk tales—hint at resurrection. But the doctrine of eternal punishment and paradise blossomed in the later literature for the very same reason it has entered Christianity: to attract the flock.


G-d Is Not Nice - Read More