September 11, 2012

The Pita that Reived Terror

And all the nations will see that the Name of G-d is called upon you and they will fear you. (From this week's Torah portion, Ki Tavo, Deuteronomy 28:10)

During the First Lebanon War, the IDF forced the PLO terrorists all the way to the Beirut port and from there to Tunisia. The PLO, which had lost its stronghold in Lebanon was shattered. Salach Taamri, the most senior and admired terrorist captured by the IDF, was imprisoned in the Ansar detention camp. He was a broken man.
Later, he was interviewed by Aharon Barnea, who also wrote a book about him, called "To be Captive."
In Barnea's book, Taamri describes the situation of the terror organization prior to Pesach, 28 years ago. "I concluded," said Taamri, "that we had no chance to overpower Israel's financial and military prowess, and that we should make do with the crumbs that they would throw us and fold up all our flags." Taamri, an intellectual and patriot, willingly cooperated with his captors. The other prisoners understood from their admired commander that the end had come and the war was lost. And then, Taamri continued, a surprising event took place that turned everything upside down.

"My hands were holding the cold bars and I was looking from inside my dark jail cell toward the hall, where an Israeli guard was walking. I saw him from far. He was walking slowly, holding something in his hand that he would constantly bring close to his mouth. He would bring it close and then distance it. When he was close to my cell, I called to him. I saw that he was eating a pita. He would bite, chew, bite and chew.

'You are a Jew,' I said to him. 'Why are you eating chametz on Pesach? Don't you know that it is forbidden for a Jew to eat chametz on this holiday?

'I am not committed to the things that happened to my People during the exodus from Egypt 2000 years ago. I have no connection to it,' said the Jewish prison guard.

I sat on the mattress in my cell and said to myself: A nation of people who do not have a connection with their past; who are willing to publicly desecrate the laws of their faith, is a nation that has cut off the roots from its land. We will be able to achieve our goals. On that night, my approach completely changed. I couldn't fall asleep. In all those hours of darkness, I replayed that scene with the Jewish prison guard.

The next morning I gathered the Palestinian leadership in the prison; all those who knew my opinion over the years. I told them about my experience and the conclusions that I reached. I clarified to everyone that from that morning, we were embarking on a new course: a war for everything. Not for a small percentage and not for crumbs that they would throw us. For opposing us was a nation that lacked the connection to its roots; a nation not interested in its past. Thus, its motivation was necessarily void of any will to struggle and fight.
Since then, I have told my story to tens of thousands. I convinced all of them that the approach must be changed and that we must struggle without compromise."

Taamri was elected to the Palestinian parliament and indeed convinced his friends, breathing new spirit into the war against Israel. The damage done by that pita eaten by the Israeli soldier on the holiday of Pesach cannot be exaggerated.

The question mark hovering over the right of the Jewish state to exist – and as a result, over its right to defend itself in the face of existential threat – is directly connected to the verse from this week's Torah portion above.

When the nations of the world see that G-d's Name is called upon us, when we know who we are, understand what we represent and are at peace with our destiny, the power of deterrence that the terrorist Taamri initially felt will be established. But when it turns out that we are not interested in G-d's Name being called upon us, the nations can openly plan to destroy us, with nuclear weapons or in any other way – with no fear.


Shabbat Shalom,



Moshe Feiglin

Jerusalem, Washington, And The Iranian Question

Keeping-Jerusalem
The Jewish people have had bitter experience in recent decades with enemies who repeatedly vow to destroy them. Despite this, here are some of the arguments being presented as to why Israel should not attack Iran:

● Israel will require American support – meaning intelligence, equipment, diplomacy – for whatever actions it takes against Iran.

● An Israeli attack might not succeed, and/or might only delay the Iranian nuclear program.

● A strike could trigger rocket attacks against Israel, followed by a drawn-out war.

● Obama truly wants to prevent Iran from going nuclear, and an Israeli attack would weaken his hand.

On the other hand, here are some of the arguments in favor of a pre-emptive Israeli strike:

● Iranian leaders have repeatedly stated their goal of destroying Israel. Nuclear weapons will allow them to realize this goal – or to continue to threaten to do so while encouraging Hamas and Hizbullah to attack Israel.

● An Israeli attack will not lead to all-out war, for neither Iran nor Israel are interested in it; each side will carefully measure its actions and responses so as to ensure that war does not occur.

● Diplomacy has run its course, with even UN diplomats now saying Iran uses negotiations as a stalling tactic. Similarly, the sanctions are too late, as Israel can't afford to wait a year or two to see if they will be successful.

● A Wall Street Journal editorial said that because of the U.S. presidential election, American opposition is no longer red but yellow. Washington knows the time to act against Iran is running out, and Obama will be hard-pressed to oppose an Israeli strike with Election Day approaching.

As the editorial put it, "If the U.S. has no serious intention to go beyond sanctions, Israel's only alternative to action is to accept a nuclear Iran and then stand by as the rest of its neighbors acquire nuclear weapons of their own. That scenario is the probable end of Israel." In short, it is a zero-sum game: Either Obama will go for it, thus "saving" Israel, or he won't, and then Israel must attack.


Read More:

http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/keeping-jerusalem/jerusalem-washington-and-the-iranian-question/2012/09/06/0/?print

Should Israel bet the farm on U.S. promises?

U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, left, and Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak deliver statements, Aug. 1, 2012.
U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, left, and Israel's Defense Minister Ehud Barak deliver statements, Aug. 1, 2012.
Photo Credit: Tsafrir Abayov/Flash90/Maariv & NRG OUT
Recently, Israel’s security cabinet met for 10 hours to discuss, among other things, Iran. Details of  the meeting were secret, but
It is likely that among the issues discussed were the “red lines” that Israel would like the United States to establish as a way of deterring Iran from moving ahead. While Netanyahu has not publicly declared what he thinks those red lines should be, Uzi Arad, the former head of the National Security Council, said that they could include a declaration that any uranium enrichment beyond 20 percent would be a direct trigger for military action.

Arad, in an Israel Radio interview, said other possible red lines could be the discovery of additional uranium enrichment plants – like the once secret facilities at Natanz and Fordow – or the interference with the work of International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors.

In addition, Arad said that the US has not yet spoken in “categorical terms” making crystal clear its determination to stop the Iranian nuclear march.

An example of this, he said, would be clearer presidential declarations to the effect that the US will not tolerate or allow a nuclear Iran, and will use all means to prevent it.

Other “categorical” expressions of this determination, Arad said, could be congressional authorization now of the use of force if diplomacy fails to convince the Iranians to halt, and a clear statement that the military objective of any US action would not be to “buy time,” but rather to prevent Iran from ever being able to build a nuclear bomb.


Read More:

http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/fresno-zionism/should-israel-bet-the-farm-on-u-s-promises/2012/09/06/0/?print

September 11, 2001..... - Yaakov Kirschen (Dry Bones)


November 20, 2001
Dry Bones cartoon: Kirschen, September 11, Terrorism, terrorists, attack, NYC, NY, Iraq, Afghanistan, America,
I drew today's cartoon back in 2001.
A month had passed since the September 11 attack on the Twin Towers.
Eleven years have now gone by.


http://drybonesblog.blogspot.com/2012/09/september-11-2001.html

Report of New Iranian Nuclear Work Backs Up Israel’s Claims



Qoms Nuclear Site
Qoms Nuclear Site
Israel news photo: NASA
 
An Associated Press report that new intelligence reveals Iran is moving closer to nuclear capability strengthens Israel’s position and could not come at a worse time for United States President Barack Obama.
The news agency said that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) concluded that Iran has made progress in calculating the destructive power of an atomic warhead, which presumably would be used as a threat to destroy Israel.

The sources of the new intelligence are the two unidentified Western countries, plus the United States and Israel.


Read More:

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/159871#.UE89fa6JRls

September 10, 2012

Jerusalem Debacle at the DNC: Whither the Jewish Vote?


 YouTube Preview Image

I was both elated and scared when I heard the “nays” and “boos” emanating from the Democratic National Convention floor Wednesday as a pathetic Antonio Villaraigosa desperately tried to take votes amending the Democratic platform on “God” and “Jerusalem” — elated because I was watching a bogus public dumb show come apart, at least temporarily, at the seams, but scared because I was staring, again at least temporarily, into the gaping yaw of the 1930s.
For those fleeting seconds, I realized that, yes, it could also happen here, because, make no mistake about it, those copious boos were not for “God” (except, perhaps, for a few scattered nitwits), but for Israel. A sizable and serious claque on the Democratic National Convention floor was shouting and applauding against the Jews.
Back when I was a kid, when I used to see the Auschwitz numbers on the arms of the nurses in my doctor father’s office, I would wonder how something that horrible could happen. It was beyond my childhood imagination. No longer, unfortunately. Not that the Democratic Party is the equivalent of the Nazi Party, even remotely. I won’t indulge in that game. But those boos, taken with the overall theme of the convention — that we all belong to the government — are chilling. That people of color are often the ones being seduced by this garbage is even more depressing to this ex-civil rights worker. Where, oh where, is Martin Luther King?

Read More:

http://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/2012/09/06/jerusalem-debacle-at-the-dnc/

Conservative Jews must unite in order to defeat the coalition of Arabs and Jewish leftists.

Protest this

The right wing is fragmented. People of strong principles lack the tolerance of the spineless left. Haredim detest less Orthodox Jews who detest atheists who detest haredim. Conservative Jews must unite in order to defeat the coalition of Arabs and Jewish leftists. The unification platform should be the lowest common denominator of the various right-wing groups: a Jewish state without Arabs, extra-hard responses to terrorism, and an at least autonomous Judea. Differences would have to be glossed over. Religious Jews can theoretically accept a small number of non-voting Arabs, which pragmatic nationalists oppose. The mere cessation of territorial concessions is too modest a goal for many who would rather return all of Judea and Samaria under Jewish control. Those differences are not essential now. First, we need to stop the onslaught on the Jewish state by Arabs (demographically) and leftists (politically).
Years from now, if we succeed, we can debate the degree of religious education to be required in Israeli schools, the cessation of atheist propaganda, and bringing the Jews back to Judaism. For now, religious Jews have to accept secular Jews as full partners. A strong, defiant, ideologically charged Jewish state would turn more Jews to our religious and cultural roots, and ease the religious-secular divide. Absent of leftist brainwashing, the children of today’s atheists could become traditionalist or even Orthodox Jews.

Read More:

http://samsonblinded.com/blog/protest-this.htm

September 6, 2012

Maybe it's time to realize that Israel is on its own



Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Bret Stephens argues that maybe it's time for Israel to realize that we really are on our own (Hat Tip: Soccer Dad). Maybe, dear Western reader, you think the administration is right to stay Israel's hand—because you'd rather have the U.S. do the job cleanly, after exhausting whatever other options remain, rather than risk having Israel do the job messily. Maybe you have a fair and defensible point.

Or maybe you think that the mullahs nuclear ambitions are their own business and they'll leave us alone if only we leave them. Maybe you're Ron Paul.

Read More:

http://israelmatzav.blogspot.com/2012/09/maybe-its-time-to-realize-that-israel.html

Identity, Meaning And Liberty

Feiglin-Moshe
If it wants to survive and thrive, Israel must base itself upon three key concepts: identity, meaning, and liberty.

Identity: This means asking ourselves who we are. Jews? Israelis? Just partners in a large insurance firm called the State of Israel? What is our shared narrative? Do we have a shared founding ethos? What is the significance of the fact that we are a Jewish state? Do we even have a common identity? Is it right to search for it and to attempt to shape it?

For some, it is enough that we all speak Hebrew. For others, that is not even the beginning of a common identity. To me, there is no such thing as a Jewish state without a clear and solid Jewish identity – not a religious identity, but a cultural identity.

I oppose religious legislation, instead preferring to allow our Jewish cultural common denominator to develop freely. While there is no Israeli law that requires new parents to circumcise their child according to Jewish law, the vast majority of Israelis still do so. It follows that we do not also need other religious legislation. Ultimately it is the community – not the state – that must decide on its religious character.

If the community chooses, it will have privately-owned public transportation within its parameters on Shabbat. If it chooses otherwise, the buses will not run. If the community chooses to open businesses on Shabbat, they will open. If not, they will remain closed. I trust the Jews, over 80 percent of who are deeply connected and committed to their Jewish identity. I also know that coercion will boomerang.

In short, I wish to emphasize and empower our Jewish identity by removing the fear and coercion, allowing the public’s true will to emerge as the guiding force behind our Jewish national identity.


Read More:

http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/moshe-feiglin/identity-meaning-and-liberty/2012/09/05/0/?print

Disturbing Trends At Fox News

Greenfield-090712
“Fair and Balanced” is fast becoming more slogan than operating system at Fox News, and nowhere is this seen more clearly than in the way Israel is increasingly being treated and the extent to which anti-Semitism is tolerated as part of the cable channel’s conversation.

Here are a few examples:

● For some time, Fox has been using Michael Scheuer as a commentator. Bill O’Reilly is most responsible for this, but Judge Anthony Napolitano also made Scheuer a regular. This pompous “head of the Bin Laden Desk” at the CIA foams at the mouth whenever he can steer the conversation to Israel.

In his book Marching Toward Hell, Scheuer gives us that nasty bit of anti-Semitic trope that “the war in Iraq…was instigated by U.S. citizen Israel-firsters and their evangelical Christian allies.”

Read More:

http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/disturbing-trends-at-fox-news/2012/09/05/0/?print